Showing posts with label Bliss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bliss. Show all posts
How to be blissful and happy all the time without external stimulus: have a nondual awakening.




happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com
Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
Q. How does the nondual state compare to sex? How does the nondual state compare to psychedelics? Does sex affect the nondual state...

7 Comments

Soh Wei Yu
How I came across this:
Recently I had an exchange of sorts with a number of spiritual teachers, I sent them the AtR links and see what their responses are. Most teachers are appreciative, and usually they send me some of their own links and I read up on them to find out more. 
 
Gary Weber told me that there is much that is very similar to his work and that I might enjoy my talk "The End of Suffering and the Default Mode Network" ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX1IFUDNtto&feature=youtu.be ) for a scientific approach to awakening with lots of citations and papers.

In it he mentioned something about his research and comparison between meditators, nondual and psychedelics, and how nondual people have an even better state than those on psychedelics.
So I went to search up on that. Another link: http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/.../magic...
The End of Suffering and the Default Mode Network
YOUTUBE.COM
The End of Suffering and the Default Mode Network
The End of Suffering and the Default Mode Network
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 1h
  • Soh Wei Yu
    I wrote this years ago - This is not an exaggeration at all:
    Why awakening is so worth it
    From time to time, people ask me why should they seek awakening. I say, awakening will be the best thing that happen in your life, I guarantee it. It is worth whatever effort you put into it. You won't regret it. Or as Daniel M. Ingram said, "Would I trade this for anything? Maybe world peace, but I would have to think about it. Until then, this totally rocks, and missing out on it would be barking crazy from my point of view."
    What is it like? I can only give a little preview, an excerpt of what I wrote taken from the AtR guide:
    "Personally, I can say from direct experience that direct realization is completely direct, immediate, and non-intellectual, it is the most direct and intimate taste of reality beyond the realm of imagination. It far exceeds one’s expectations and is far superior to anything the mind can ever imagine or dream of. It is utter freedom. Can you imagine living every moment in purity and perfection without effort, where grasping at identity does not take hold, where there is not a trace or sense of 'I' as a seer, feeler, thinker, doer, be-er/being, an agent, a 'self' entity residing inside the body somewhere relating to an outside world, and what shines forth and stands out in the absence of a 'self' is a very marvellous, wondrous, vivid, alive world that is full of intense vividness, joy, clarity, vitality, and an intelligence that is operating as every spontaneous action (there is no sense of being a doer), where any bodily actions, speech and thoughts are just as spontaneous as heart beating, fingernails growing, birds singing, air moving gently, breath flowing, sun shining - there is no distinction between ‘you are doing action’/’you are living’ and ‘action is being done to you’/’you are being lived’ (as there is simply no ‘you’ and ‘it’ - only total and boundless spontaneous presencing).
    This is a world where nothing can ever sully and touch that purity and perfection, where the whole of universe/whole of mind is always experienced vividly as that very purity and perfection devoid of any kind of sense of self or perceiver whatsoever that is experiencing the world at a distance from a vantagepoint -- life without ‘self’ is a living paradise free of afflictive/painful emotions, where every color, sound, smell, taste, touch and detail of the world stands out as the very boundless field of pristine awareness, sparkling brilliance/radiance, colorful, high-saturation, HD, luminous, heightened intensity and shining wonderment and magicality, where the surrounding sights, sounds, scents, sensations, smells, thoughts are seen and experienced so clearly down to the tiniest details, vividly and naturally, not just in one sense door but all six, where the world is a fairy-tale like wonderland, revealed anew every moment in its fullest depths as if you are a new-born baby experiencing life for the first time, afresh and never seen before, where life is abundant with peace, joy and fearlessness even amidst the apparent chaos and troubles of life, and everything experienced through all the senses far surpasses any beauty previously experienced, as if the universe is like heaven made of glittering gold and jewels, experienced in complete gapless directness without separation, where life and the universe is experienced in its intense lucidity, clarity, aliveness and vivifying presence not only without intermediary and separation but without center and boundaries - infinitude as vast as an endless night sky is actualized every moment, an infinitude that is simply the vast universe appearing as an empty, distanceless, dimensionless and powerful presencing, where the mountains and stars on the horizon stands out no more distant than one’s breath, and shines forth as intimately as one’s heartbeat, where the cosmic scale of infinitude is actualized even in ordinary activities as the entirety of the universe is always participating as every ordinary activity including walking and breathing and one’s very body (without a trace of an ‘I’ or ‘mine’) is as much the universe/dependent origination in action and there is nothing outside of this boundless exertion/universe, where the purity and infinitude of the marvellous world experienced through being cleansed in all doors of perception is constant. (If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is: Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern. - William Blake)
    You know all the Mahayana Sutras (e.g. Vimalakirti Sutra), old Zen talks about seeing this very earth as pure land and all the Vajrayana talks about the point of tantra as the pure vision of seeing this very world, body, speech and mind in its primordial unfabricated purity as the Buddha field, palace, mandala, mantra and deity? Now you truly get it, you realise everything is really just like that when experienced in its primordial purity and perfection, and that the old sages have not been exaggerating at all. It is as much a literal and precise description of the state of consciousness as it is a metaphor. As I told John Tan before, Amitabha Sutra’s description of pure land resembles my living experience here and now. “To me it just means anatta. When what’s seen, tasted, touched, smelled are in clean purity, everywhere is pure land.” - John Tan, 2019. "If one is free from background self, all manifestations appear in clean purity in taste. Impurities from what I know come from mental constructions." – John Tan, 2020
    This is a freedom that is free from any artificially constructed boundaries and limitations. And yet, this boundlessness does not in any way lead to the dissociation from one’s body, instead one feels more alive than ever as one’s very body, one grows ever more somatic, at home and intimate as one’s body. This is not a body normally conceived of, as the boundaries of an artificially solidified body that stands separated from the universe, dissolve into energetic streams of aliveness dancing and pulsating throughout the body in high energy and pleasure, as well as sensations of foot steps, movement, palm touching an object, where the body is no longer conflated with a constructed boundary of ‘inside’ and ‘outside’, ‘self’ or ‘other’, where no trace of an ‘inside’ and an ‘outside’ can be found in one’s state of consciousness - there’s only one indivisible, boundless and measureless world/mind - only this infinitude of a dynamic and seamlessly interconnected dance that we call ‘the universe’. This is better than any passing peak experiences be they arisen spontaneously, in meditation or through the use of psychedelic substances. And yet, despite experiencing life to it fullest every moment without any veils, in complete openness and utter nakedness, nothing gains a foothold in consciousness, for as vivid as they are, they leave no trace just as a bird leaves no tracks in the sky, an empty and lucid display such as a gust of wind and the glittery reflections of moon on the ocean waves - appearing but nothing ‘there’ or anywhere. All these words and descriptions I just wrote came very easily and spontaneously in a very short time as I am simply describing my current state of experience that is experienced every moment. I am not being poetic here but simply being as direct and clear as possible about what is immediately experienced. And this is only a figment that I am describing. If I were to tell you more of what this is like, you would not believe it. But once you enter this gateless realm you shall see that words always pale in comparison."
    Labels: Anatta |
    • Reply
    • 1h
    • Edited
  • Yin Ling
    Agree. Don’t need even bliss, just reduce suffering is already bliss.
    It’s Probably the only way or method that works to drop my suffering
  • Yin Ling
    Btw soh the link doesn’t work on my phone somehow
    Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
    HAPPINESSBEYONDTHOUGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
    Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
    •  
       
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 31m
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Yin Ling oh you are right. Cannot view from phone only pc.
  • Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
    HAPPINESSBEYONDTHOUGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
    Which is more pleasurable...psychedelics, the nondual state, or sex?
  • Reply
  • Remove Preview
  • 8m
  •  
  • Soh Wei Yu
    I remember John Tan once made a similar comparison, but instead I would say nondual presence is even better, rather than just similar - http://www.awakeningtoreality.com/.../transcript-with...
    "John: I had an experience when I was 17. That time when I experienced the I AMness, then I AM Everything. At that time I very much wanted to become a monk. When I first experienced, it lasted for many days, not just (hours?) Then when it rained, I suddenly strip off all my clothes, then I go out and get drenched, and kept laughing and smiling. Because I think I am everything – I like being (dripped) by the rain. Then I thought, if there is a waterfall, I can just sit there and how nice that will be! Then I saw a dog, I really wanted to go and touch it. That was when I was 17 years old, suddenly I had this ? intoxicated. So when the bond of the consciousness is being released, (?). Then when I meditate, you will not believe the kind of bliss that I undergo. That kind of intoxication, it is just like taking drugs. "
    Transcript with Thusness 2012 - Group Gathering
    AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
    Transcript with Thusness 2012 - Group Gathering
    Transcript with Thusness 2012 - Group Gathering
    • Like
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 12m
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Also even if psychedelics provide some people (that is not the path I went through, John Tan and I reached I AM through self enquiry) a glimpse of I AM, it will not be able to bring them into deeper insights like anatta or emptiness which is even more crucial. In any case taking psychedelics for spiritual purposes is not a path I recommend, self enquiry and meditation is better IMO. But for psychological and other healing purposes, then if the state or country (some countries do allow) allows, like even in Singapore which everyone knows is a hardcore anti-drug country, even here we just legalized the psychedelic/dissociative Ketamine for treatment of serious depression last year, in such cases I believe it can be very beneficial.
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 11m
    • Edited
  • Yin Ling
    Soh Wei Yu yea. Actually until now I still have this “like taking drugs” feelings whenever I meditate or even in daily life if ppl leave me alone(they don’t thankfullly) I will just meditate day and night 😂
    • Like
    • Reply
    • 1m


  • Joe Pardue
    I agree with Daniel Ingram that perpetual bliss models of awakening are unrealistic at best. Impermanence will always come and knock us back down to reality and suffering again at some point, even with the arising of non-dual wisdom. Much more realistic to hope for reduced mental suffering and anxiety than for total elimination of all negative or painful emotions forever imo.
    I'd be very skeptical of anyone who claims to be in a bliss state 24/7 365 days a year. I'd think they were trying to sell me something. Just not the way reality works unfortunately, even for enlightened people.
    • Reply
    • 8h
    • Edited
  • The Incredible Bliss of Anatta
    AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
    The Incredible Bliss of Anatta
    The Incredible Bliss of Anatta
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 7h
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Total removal of all suffering is also possible but you must reach arahant stage. Or eighth bhumi or buddha
  • Joe Pardue
    Soh Wei Yu Oh I know that anatta, emptiness, the non-dual wisdom of suchness - those realizations bring unimaginable feelings of peace. I've had those experiences, levels of bliss I never thought possible. But no bliss state remains forever. Why? It just goes back to impermanence.
    The teachings are fundamentally built on impermanence. Understanding the fact of impermanence is part and parcel of understanding emptiness. From a metaphysical standpoint, no impermanence = no emptiness. So to throw that out at some point and just say "No, now permanence IS possible, because we can be happy and blissful 24/7" is a huge contradiction. This is also addressed well by Ingram in MCTB.
    It's the same problem that he brings up when talking about the emotional perfection models. The false idea that somehow enlightenment will make one completely morally pure and perfect and never able to do anything bad again. Well we know that's not true just by looking at all the supposedly enlightened masters who have done horrible things to others in their personal lives. Perfection in any sense, emotionally, psychologically, morally, is imo a misguided goal.
    • Reply
    • 7h
    • Edited
  • Joe Pardue
    Soh Wei Yu Eh, I don't buy that that's possible even if you reach that level. Again, look at all the masters who've had high realization who did terrible things from a moral standpoint. Some of them were definitely Arhats. Sogyal Rinpoche? Hurting others usually comes from one's one emotional pain in some sense. What about Trungpa? Reading his books, he certainly seems like he had high realization, probably an Arhat, but he wasn't exactly a model human being, and sure seems like he suffered a lot.
    So do you then not believe Daniel Ingram when he says he's an Arhat?
    • Reply
    • 7h
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Joe Pardue sogyal rinpoche is definitely Not an arahat, in fact not even a sotapanna in my books. I only saw him describe I Am and possible nondual experience but not anatta insight.
    I have also expressed my skepticism about Trungpa, i doubt he even reached stream entry. He described no mind experience but not anatta realisation
    • Reply
    • 5h
    • Edited
  • [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional Buddhism
    AWAKENINGTOREALITY.COM
    [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional Buddhism
    [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of "Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic Dharma and traditional Buddhism
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 5h
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Joe Pardue john tan told me this year to make the above thread to the top of the reading list in our blog.
    It clarifies much misunderstandings.
  • Soh Wei Yu
    It is rare even among masters to realise anatta
    Even though to realise anatta is also not an end
    “Though buddha nature is plainness and most direct, these are still the steps. If one does not know the process and said ‘yes this is it’… then it is extremely misleading. For 99 percent [of ‘realized’/’enlightened’ persons] what one is talking about is "I AMness", and has not gone beyond permanence, still thinking [of] permanence, formless… ...all and almost all will think of it along the line of "I AMness", all are like the grandchildren of "AMness", and that is the root cause of duality.” - John Tan, 2007
  • Joe Pardue
    Soh Wei Yu My point is that having insight into the nature of reality does not change the fundamental fact that every experience, whether blissful or suffering, is temporary. Since even enlightened people still live on the level of the relative, all of their experiences, good or bad, will be transitory, as will the experiences of ordinary people.
    To believe that there is a possible permanent, unchanging state of being that can be attained in any sense is to go directly against the Buddha's foundational teaching of impermanence, which is at the very core of the dharma.
    And my other point is that having insight into the nature of reality does *not* make one perfect in any way - morally, psychologically or otherwise. I know that because I have personally had deep insights and I am in no way perfect.
    And it isn't just that if I had more insights I would be perfect, or if I trained or practiced and meditated more then I would be perfect at some point. None of us can ever achieve complete perfection because of the fact that life moves in cycles and, again, everything changes.
    We make mistakes, we fail, then we succeed, then we fail again. Just like Summer changes to fall and fall changes to Winter and Winter changes back to Spring. We don't control that process of cycling because we *are* the process. That's why mental suffering can never be completely removed. Whatever bliss we might be experiencing will cycle and transform back to suffering at some point.
    Even enlightened people who have seen directly into dharmata, suchness, with the light of non-conceptual wisdom are still subject to this impermanence simply because they still live in the relative world where change is a brute, unavoidable fact.
    • Reply
    • 4h
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Realizations and attainments are permanent: they permanently put an end to fetters and tendencies.
    For example, stream entry puts an end to the first three fetters permanently. This is why realization is not an experience.
  • SUTTACENTRAL.NET
    suttacentral.net | 502: Bad gateway
    suttacentral.net | 502: Bad gateway
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 4h
  • Joe Pardue
    Soh Wei Yu Nope, you can't get away with saying that without denying impermanence, and thus undermining a core tenet of the teachings. You are trying to have your cake and eat it too.
    Even if you are talking about permanent realizations, that still d…
    See more
    • Reply
    • 3h
    • Edited
  • Geovani Geo
    Joe Pardue, that is purely theoretical. I mean "theoretical" in an impersonal way. The thing is that you are imagining an enlightened dude and eventual events that could happen to him. These are all images in a mind.
  • Soh Wei Yu
    You fail to understand something: impermanence only applies to conditioned phenomena.
    Impermanence does not apply to cessation, which is an unconditioned phenomena (although also empty).
    Nirvana (cessation) is not impermanent. It is however unreal and a mere designation.
    Also I wrote this on reddit two months ago:
    Anatta, unlike the other two seals, covers both conditioned and unconditioned phenomena such as cessation or unbinding [nirvana]. (The three marks are: sabbe saṅkhārā aniccā — "all saṅkhāras (conditioned things) are impermanent" sabbe saṅkhārā dukkhā — "all saṅkhāras are unsatisfactory" sabbe dhammā anattā — "all dharmas (conditioned or unconditioned things) are not self" https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwji_JSwlMb3AhXCmuYKHdlvBUkQFnoECAwQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FThree_marks_of_existence&usg=AOvVaw0zJ_UvB957Jv1sHHe5M8-V )
    Three marks of existence - Wikipedia
    EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
    Three marks of existence - Wikipedia
    Three marks of existence - Wikipedia
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 3h
  • Joe Pardue
    Geovani Geo It's not really theoretical, the point is to show that realization is in no way permanent because there are things that could happen to reverse those realizations even if they did occur.
    • Reply
    • 3h
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Also Daniel agrees with me that awakening is about the permanent end of something (the illusion of self), not about an experience. I will see if I can find what he said when I get home.
    • Reply
    • 3h
    • Edited
  • Joe Pardue
    Soh Wei Yu The absolute is always approached through the relative/conventional. You know this. Dharmadhatu is cognized through non-dual wisdom/rigpa, which is itself relative. It is the nature of an *appearance* which is known to be suchness (the "ultimate"). All this also implies an agent on the relative level who is doing the cognizing/abiding in non-dual wisdom.
    All of this - non dual wisdom, the appearance which is being cognized, and the agent which is doing the cognizing, are relative (and ultimately empty) phenomena. Being empty, all of them are impermanent and conditioned.
    Nibbana may not be conditioned, but the relative agent who knows Nibbana is completely conditioned, impermanent, and transitory in every way. And since the agent only approaches or knows Nibbana through his or her Wisdom, and since that Wisdom is conditioned and impermanent, it cannot be so that that person can possibly remain permanently in an unchanging state of non-dual equipoise.
    • Reply
    • 3h
    • Edited
  • Geovani Geo
    Joe Pardue, "realization" as a state must be impermanent. But, just as an exercise of imagination: can space be ended?
  • Joe Pardue
    Geovani Geo Are you referring to the basic spaciousness of phenomena in their "real" nature beyond elaboration and concepts?
  • Geovani Geo
    Joe Pardue, Yes. For space is just an analogy.
  • Joe Pardue
    Geovani Geo Well I would say no then, as phenomena in their basic spaciousness, as Dharmadhatu, are beyond the four extremes of existence, non-existence, both or neither, so to talk about anything ending or not ending ultimately doesn't make sense.
    • Reply
    • 3h
    • Edited
  • Geovani Geo
    Joe Pardue. Yes. Also, as I see it, the same with permanent and not permanent. And the "space" of the analogy is inert while the underlying meaning is not. What this "not" could mean? Lucid? Aware? Open and receptive like Lao Tzu's "spirit of the valley"?
  • Geovani Geo
    So, when we regard the meaning of "enlightened person" one must be careful to not conceptualize. Enlightenment and Dharmkaya are the same.
  • Joe Pardue
    Geovani Geo We have to distinguish between the ultimate and the relative levels of things. As I see it, the relative world of appearances, or the world of impermanence, still retains it's validity even after one has seen the ultimate.
    If the entire path, which takes places on the relative level, were realized to be a cognitive error upon seeing the ultimate beyond fabrications, what incentive would the Buddha have had to teach after his awakening?
    If the relative did not retain it's validity after one's seeing the ultimate, then to talk of only being able to approach the ultimate through the relative, as is asserted by Nagarjuna and many other masters, would be nonsensical.
    • Reply
    • 2h
    • Edited
  • Geovani Geo
    Joe Pardue, of course the relative it maintains its validity. Nonetheless, its interesting how we visualize such "approaching the ultimate through the relative". We eventually see it as something getting closer to some other. But that is not the case at all - imo. As I see it, in fact, the relative stops making noises, stops claiming that it is other then the ultimate. It is the claims that stop, no? Also, not that the relative comes to see the ultimate, but there is the realization that the claims where conceptual clouds seemingly obstructing the seeing - not specifically a seeing of the relative. Such seeing is entity-less. I don't know.... maybe you (or others) see it otherwise.
    • Reply
    • 2h
    • Edited
  • Yin Ling
    Saw this on my newsfeed, just gonna say one or two words.
    U seem to be closing ur door to a place where complete liberation is possible.
    Realisation is a permanent shift in perception. It is not a myth for me.
    Suffering can drop. Massively.
    But no one can convince u, not even the buddha himself.
    It’s up to u to work hard and find out. 🙂 hope u don’t close ur doors too early. Just a light comment, I don’t want to debate. 🙂
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Well said.
    Also I was just reminded of an explanation by Kyle Dixon, I liked it including Tsele Natsok Rangdrol's analogy.
    User avatar
    level 1
    krodha
    ·
    3 yr. ago
    ·
    edited 3 yr. ago
    Nirvana is a species of cessation, and is defined as a total cessation of cause for rebirth in the three realms. Once the cause of affliction is exhausted there is no longer a means for it to re-arise, hence buddhahood is irreversible and permanent.
    Nirvāṇa is the total exhaustion of one's ignorance regarding the nature of phenomena, and for that reason nirvāṇa is described as a cessation. What ceases is the cause for the further arising and proliferation of delusion regarding the nature of phenomena, which is precisely the cessation of cause for the arising of the cyclical round of rebirth in the three realms we call "saṃsāra."
    For this reason, nirvāṇa is said to be 'permanent', because due to the exhaustion of cause for the further proliferation of saṃsāra, saṃsāra no longer has any way to arise.
    Tsele Natsok Rangdrol:
    You might ask, 'Why wouldn't confusion reoccur as before, after... [liberation has occured]?" This is because no basis [foundation] exists for its re-arising. Samantabhadra's liberation into the basis [wisdom] itself and the yogi liberated through practicing the path are both devoid of any basis [foundation] for reverting back to becoming a cause, just like a person who has recovered from a plague or the fruit of the se tree.
    He then states that the se tree is a particular tree which is poisonous to touch, causing blisters and swelling. However once recovered, one is then immune.
    Lopon Tenzin Namdak also explains this principle of immunity:
    Anyone who follows the teachings of the Buddhas will most likely attain results and purify negative karmic causes. Then that person will be like a man who has caught smallpox in the past; he will never catch it again because he is immune. The sickness of samsara will never come back. And this is the purpose of following the teachings.
    and from Lopon Kunga Namdrol:
    Buddhahood is a subtractive process; it means removing, gradually, obscurations of affliction and obscurations of knowledge. Since wisdom burns these obscurations away, in the end they have no causes for returning; and further, the causes for buddhahood are permanent leading to a permanent result.
    11
    Give Award
    Share
    Report
    Save
    User avatar
    level 2
    unkeptzen
    ·
    3 yr. ago
    Nirvana is a species of cessation
    I guess you could say that nirvana is the cessation of conditionality which reveals the unconditioned.
    1
    Give Award
    Share
    Report
    Save
  • Soh Wei Yu
    User avatar
    level 3
    krodha
    ·
    3 yr. ago
    ·
    edited 3 yr. ago
    "I guess you could say that nirvana is the cessation of conditionality which reveals the unconditioned."
    Nirvana is defined as pratisaṃkhyā-nirodha or “analytical cessation.” Which is the total cessation of cause for rebirth in the three realms.
    As for “unconditioned,” there is an unconditioned nature of so-called conditioned existents, specifically; that they are figments of ignorance and are therefore non-arisen and free from extremes. But there is no "the unconditioned" as a stand-alone separate capacity.
    From Nāgārjuna:
    Since arising, abiding and perishing are not established, the conditioned is not established; since the conditioned is never established, how can the unconditioned be established?
    1
    Give Award
    Share
    Report
    Save
    User avatar
    level 4
    unkeptzen
    ·
    3 yr. ago
    I would just add that in the Pali discourses the only dhamma that is unconditioned is nibbāna (nirvana). All other dhammas are conditioned.
    Also to help you on your journey, Zen Ma-tsu says:
    The conditioned is the function of the unconditioned; the unconditioned is the essence of the conditioned.
    Both the Buddha and Jesus understood that the universe and everything in it, even our thoughts, are only the "shape of spirit" (shape being conditioned; spirit being unconditioned). But the shape hides the spirit if one is not, personally, awakened to the spirit. God too is spirit (Jhn 4:24). For those of us who have meditated in deep forests and in caves, setting the books aside, the unconditioned has to be personally witnessed. Peace to you pandita
    1
    Give Award
    Share
    Report
    Save
    User avatar
    level 5
    krodha
    ·
    3 yr. ago
    "I would just add that in the Pali discourses the only dhamma that is unconditioned is nibbāna (nirvana). All other dhammas are conditioned."
    In Mahāyāna there are three unconditioned dharmas, which are space and two forms of cessation, nirvana is one of those cessations.
    1
    Give Award
    Share
    Report
    Save
  • Cheng Chen
    I’ve known about Gary Weber’s work for a while, but didn’t know he was still active. Soh Wei Yu you’re in touch with him? Is he still putting out content?
    Soh Wei Yu
    Cheng Chen Only just one e-mail. I spam the 7 stages and On Anatta, Emptiness article to all the spiritual teachers in the world 🤣🤣🤣
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Even Eckhart Tolle thanked me too. 😂
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Gary's latest blog post seem to be in 2018 https://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/
    happinessbeyondthought
    HAPPINESSBEYONDTHOUGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
    happinessbeyondthought
    happinessbeyondthought
    • Reply
    • Remove Preview
    • 1h
    • Edited
  • Soh Wei Yu
    Cheng Chen But the e-mail reply is from today.
    • Reply
    • 1h
    • Edited
  • Geovani Geo
    Soh Wei Yu "I spam the 7 stages and On Anatta, Emptiness article..."
    😀😆
  • Reply
  • 45m