Also See: Samādhi of the Treasury of Luminosity
Chinese Version of this Article:《光明藏三昧》的修行者反思
Last Updated 18/06/2025
A Practitioner's Reflection on the Kōmyōzō Zanmai
(Version 0.4)
Introduction: The Four-Fold Path of Light
The Kōmyōzō Zanmai is one of the most luminous and direct
transmissions in the Zen tradition. Authored by Koun Ejō, the direct Dharma
successor of Eihei Dōgen, this text is not a mere philosophical argument. It is
a direct pointing to the nature of reality. In this reflection, we will explore
the meticulous path to which Ejō points. While the unfolding of insight is a
dynamic process and not a rigid, linear sequence, this reflection will
articulate the journey through a framework of four major phases that are
commonly experienced:
- The
Foundational Realization of Pure Presence ("I AM"): The
initial breakthrough of dis-identifying from the contents of mind and
recognizing the timeless, formless, ever-present awareness that is the
ground of all experience. While a crucial step, this can also lead to the
subtle reification of this 'ground' as an ultimate, changeless Self.
- The
Initial Non-Dual Insight (Substantialist Nonduality / "One
Mind"): The realization that all phenomena are the luminous,
radiant display of a single Mind. The subject-object divide collapses and
is often subsumed into an ultimate Subject or 'One Mind'. While this
experience of 'All as Self' is a profound initial insight into 'No-Self',
it subtly reifies a metaphysical essence, as understanding is still
oriented from a view based on a paradigm of inherent existence and a
subtle subject-object dichotomy. This is a deviation from the ultimate
Buddhist path.
- The
Insight into Anātman (Emptiness of Self): A crucial and liberating
realization that penetrates the empty, selfless nature of Mind and the
agent (pudgala-nairātmya). Here, even the single, radiant Mind is seen to
be empty of any inherent, independent self-nature (svabhāva). It is not a
substance; rather, the knowingness is the self-knowing, dynamic, selfless,
and agentless process itself, which unfolds and knows itself by itself
without a knower.
- The
Maturation of Wisdom (Twofold Emptiness): The deepening of insight to
perceive the empty, dream-like, and insubstantial nature of all phenomena
(dharma-nairātmya). This is the realization that not only is the self
empty, but all dharmas (sights, sounds, thoughts) are also without any
inherent existence, arising like illusions or mirages. This is the path of
purifying the subtle "obstruction of knowledge" (jñeya-āvaraṇa) and seeing reality as
it truly is—vividly apparent, yet utterly empty.
In this reflection, we will explore not only Ejō's pointing
but also practical methods of self-enquiry. While we do not know the exact
pedagogical tools Ejō used with his students, the methods discussed here, drawn
from the broader Dharma tradition, can serve as potent tools to directly
realize the profound truths to which he points.
The Prefaces: A Lineage of Reverence
The historical prefaces by Mitsuun and Menpō frame the text
not as a mere book, but as a sacred relic—a direct conduit to the mind of the
enlightened ancestors. Their palpable joy at its rediscovery underscores its
importance. For them, these words were not just teachings about the
light; they were the living transmission of the light. They establish an
unbroken lineage from the ancient Buddhas to Ejō, asserting that what follows
is the authentic, undiluted heart of the Dharma.
Part 1: Defining the Treasury of Light - The Luminous,
Sentient Heart of Reality
Ejō begins by defining his central metaphor: the Treasury
of Light (光明藏,
kōmyōzō). Critically, this is not a cold, empty void. This is a universe
that "has a Heart." (See: The Transient Universe has a Heart https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2019/02/the-transient-universe-has-heart.html) Ejō’s
light is not the lifeless photon of physics; it is a vibrant, intelligent, and numinous
luminosity (靈光, líng
guāng). This "radiance" is the very texture of reality itself,
synonymous with what other traditions might call pristine consciousness
or pure knowingness. It is the intrinsic clarity and wakefulness of
Mind. When Zen masters speak of numinous awareness (靈知, líng zhī), they are pointing
to this very same principle—an intelligent light that is not seen with
the eyes, but is the very aware, noetic capacity behind seeing, hearing,
and knowing. It is the sentient, aware quality that makes experience possible.
Realizing the Source: The 'I AM' Before All Things:
Ejō establishes that this Light is the "source of all
Buddhas, the inherent nature of all beings, the total body of all things."
This is a direct pointing towards the first crucial breakthrough on the path:
the realization of the formless Source or Ground of Being. This is the insight
into the "I AM" that was present before Abraham, the "Original
Face before your parents were born." It is the direct, non-conceptual
realization of the Mind that is prior to all sensory and conceptual
experience—prior to seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching and thinking.
The purpose of self-enquiry, as taught in Zen and other
direct paths, is to guide the mind back to this very Source. Questions like, "Without
thoughts, tell me what is your very mind right now?" are not seeking a
conceptual answer like "void" or "hollow." Such answers are
products of the thinking mind. The question is a tool to exhaust the intellect
and create an opening for direct recognition. As Ramana Maharshi explained, the
enquiry "Who am I?" is like the stick used to stir a funeral pyre—it
destroys all other thoughts and is finally destroyed itself, revealing the
doubtless Self that remains.
This realization is not necessarily achieved by entering
deep meditative states where the senses shut down, though such states can
intensify the absorption. As many masters have pointed out, it is a matter of
realizing what is already, undeniably present. You exist, and you are aware
that you exist. This is not just a vague or mental noticing of “Oh, I exist”
but a unshakeable, doubtless realization of the Truth of Being. This dawning of
a direct certainty of your own Beingness, this objectless Presence-Awareness,
is the foundational realization. It is the simple, direct taste of your own
essence before it is clothed in the five senses or labeled by the thinking
mind.
The "All is Mind-Only" Insight (As a
Subsequent, Pedagogic Tool):
After the foundational realization of the formless Source,
the path often leads to a distinct, further insight that directly corresponds
to the Yogācāra (Cittamātra) teaching that "the three realms are
mind-only" (三界唯心).
This is the realization that all external objects are nothing but luminous
manifestations of one's own mind, collapsing the naive dualism of an inner self
and an outer world into a single, unified field of Mind.
However, it is absolutely essential to understand the true
intent of this teaching. As explained by Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche, the great
Mādhyamika masters refute the Cittamātra system only when it is misunderstood.
The error lies in reifying the mind as a truly existing substance. As Mipham
says:
"self-styled proponents of the Cittamātra tenets, when
speaking of mind-only, say that there are no external objects but that the mind
exists substantially—like a rope that is devoid of snakeness, but not devoid of
ropeness... they believe the nondual consciousness to be truly existent on the
ultimate level. It is this tenet that the Mādhyamikas repudiate."
Cittamātra, correctly understood, is not a metaphysical
assertion of a transcendental, ultimate Mind (like Brahman). Rather, it is an expedient
pedagogic tool designed to break our attachment to the reality of external
objects. The progressive path, as outlined by Asaṅga
and echoed by Brunnhölzl, is as follows:
- One
first understands that all phenomena are simply the mind.
- Subsequently,
one has the experience that there is no object to be apprehended in the
mind.
- Then,
one realizes that because there is no object, neither is there a subject
(a mind cognizing them).
- Immediately
after, one attains the direct realization of Suchness, devoid of the
duality of subject and object.
Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche clarifies this subtle point
perfectly. He explains that while Mādhyamika masters refute a substantially
existing mind, they do not refute the valid, conventional realization of a
non-dual "self-illuminating gnosis." Mipham states:
"If, on the other hand, that consciousness is
understood to be unborn from the very beginning (i.e. empty), to be directly
experienced by reflexive awareness, and to be self-illuminating gnosis without
subject or object, it is something to be established."
This "self-illuminating gnosis" is the profound
ground of non-dual radiance—a direct, valid experience on the path. The
critical point Mipham makes is that this gnosis is established conventionally
as a valid realization while being understood as ultimately empty and
unborn from the very beginning. The substantialist error, which Dōgen and all
Buddhist masters refute, is to mistake this valid realization for a final truth
by granting it its own independent essence, separate from the vivid, selfless
self-knowing/self-luminous appearances cognized. The deeper insight into anātman
deconstructs even this luminous ground, revealing that it has no inherent
existence apart from its own manifestations.
The Realization of No-Attainment and Non-Arising
(Mushotoku & Fushō):
Ejō’s emphasis on "no-attainment" (无所得, mushotoku) is the key that
unlocks the entire path. This principle is supported by classic Zen dialectics,
such as his reference to the Way being unobtainable by either 'a mind of
existence' or a 'mind of non-existence' (mushin, 无心), pointing directly to the
ungraspable, unfindable, and empty nature of Mind itself. The anātman
insight reveals that there is no static, background consciousness or
"Source" to be attained, only the dynamic, radiant foreground of
appearances. As John Tan explains, this "background" is an illusion
fabricated by a dualistic mind seeking something to hold on to. (Do read John
Tan's article: Thusness/PasserBy's Seven Stages of Enlightenment. You can visit
John Tan's website at https://atr-passerby.com/)
The realization of mushotoku is the direct seeing-through of this
illusion. It is not just that Mind is already here; it is that there is no
"Mind" as a separate, attainable entity apart from the transient
phenomena themselves. Ejō deepens this by linking it to the lack of self-nature
and the fundamental principle of non-arising (不生, fushō). He quotes, "The
master of mind, at ease, awakens to the fundamental non-arising of one's own
mind." Because Mind is without self-nature, it was never truly
"born" or "created" in the first place. Realization,
therefore, is not an act of acquisition but the cessation of all seeking, which
dawns when the fundamentally unobtainable and non-arisen nature of reality is
directly and irrefutably seen.
Part 2: The Foundational Realization - Discovering the
Ground of "I AM"
This initial breakthrough is the shift from identifying with
the contents of experience to identifying with the context in
which they appear—the silent, ever-present space of awareness itself. This is
the numinous awareness (靈知,
líng zhī). In the Kōmyōzō Zanmai, Ejō raises several points from
classic Zen masters to trigger this insight by turning attention away from the
object of perception and back towards the perceiver itself.
- Linji's
Pointing: "Now tell me, what is it that knows how to preach the
Dharma and listen to the Dharma?"
- The
Enjoyer of Life: "Now tell me: when you piss and shit right
now... whose enjoyment is this, ultimately?"
It is crucial here to distinguish between a mere glimpse or
recognition of this "I AM" Presence, and its full, abiding
realization. Many practitioners may experience fleeting moments of recognizing
the formless witness. This is a vital first step. However, Self-Realization
proper is the direct, unshakeable certainty of this Beingness, a Eureka!
realization beyond all doubt of what one’s Essence or Ground of Being is. The
purpose of sustained self-enquiry is to deepen these initial recognitions until
they mature into an abiding, unshakable Reality.
Expanded Practical Enquiry:
Finding the Listener ("I AM")
These are not questions for the intellect, but tools for
direct investigation designed to transform glimpses into certainty.
Method 1: Koan and Direct Pointing (The Zen Method)
- Settle
and Ask: Sit quietly in a comfortable posture. Allow your body and
mind to settle. Become aware of the ambient sounds in the room.
- Turn
the Question Inward: Now, with genuine curiosity, turn your attention
inward and ask Linji's question: "What is it that is hearing
these sounds right now?"
- Investigate
Directly and Relentlessly: Your conceptual mind will immediately try
to answer with labels. Discard them. The instruction is to find out who
is the listener, or what is listening to the sound.
- The
Realization of Objectless Presence: As you search with sustained,
non-conceptual diligence, a profound recognition will dawn: you cannot
find the listener as an object, however, It is undeniably present—clearly,
something is aware of that sound, that awareness and presence is
undeniable—but it is formless, boundless, and objectless. It has no center
and no edge—it is an all-pervading pure Presence. This is not a
realization of nothingness, but a direct certainty of Beingness
that is simply without object. This direct, non-conceptual recognition
of the formless, ever-present knower is the initial insight. Rest
in this open, knowing space of Being.
Method 2: Self-Inquiry and Neti-Neti (The Vedantic
Method)
- Systematic
Negation: Ask, "Am I this body?" Feel the sensations of the
body. You are the awareness of them. Conclude firmly: "Not
this." Observe a thought. Ask, "Am I this thought?" You are
the witness of it. "Not this."
- What
Remains? After you have negated everything perceivable, what is left
is the irreducible, undeniable, subjective sense of presence, of knowing,
of being—the "I AM." Also see: Self Enquiry, Neti Neti and the Process of Elimination https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2024/05/self-enquiry-neti-neti-and-process-of.html
A Note on Other Methods for Awakening Presence
The Song of Vajra and Sacred Sound
The principle of using sound to quiet the discursive mind
and reveal presence is found in many traditions. Beyond general mantra
recitation, there are more profound practices. The Song of Vajra is not
merely a mantra but is revered in the Dzogchen tradition as a supreme semdzin
(mind instruction).
As Chögyal Namkhai Norbu explained:
"The Song of the Vajra is like a key for all of the
methods we can learn in the Dzogchen teachings... We can learn the Song of the
Vajra in three different ways: through sound, where each sound represents the
different functions of our chakras; through the meaning of the words, which are
not easy to understand because each word is like a symbol; and through our real
condition. This threefold nature of the Song of the Vajra is related to the
three aspects of our existence (body, speech, and mind)."
Each syllable relates to specific energy points and
functions, working on a deep level to bring the practitioner directly into the
state of knowledge (rigpa). (See: https://melong.com/song-vajra-webcast-talk-adriano-clemente/)
Given its profundity, this practice requires direct transmission and initiation
from a qualified Dzogchen teacher. For those interested, such instructions and
transmissions can be sought from teachers like Acarya Malcolm Smith (See:
https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2024/01/finding-awakened-spiritual-teacher-and.html).
There are accounts of practitioners who, after receiving the
transmission, awakened to Instant Presence simply through the dedicated
practice of the Song of Vajra combined with a light, non-conceptual inquiry.
Recommendations from a Dharma Friend
The following sections are based on the advice of Sim Pern
Chong, a Dharma friend who has traversed similar phases of realization (from
"I AM" to nonduality, anātman, and the insight into emptiness), and
is offered here as a practical supplement to the self-enquiry methods. You can
visit Sim Pern Chong's website at https://innerjourneylog.weebly.com/
Mindful Meditation Practice
Sim Pern Chong offers the following guidance for formal
meditation, such as focusing on the breath at the tip of the nose:
- Let
go of the 'Meditator': Do not hold the thought that "I am
meditating." Release the sense of a person performing an action.
- Effortless
Awareness: Simply be aware of the breath as it is. Do not control or
deliberately alter its natural rhythm.
- Posture
is Key: Maintain a straight spine (preferably unsupported by wall) and neck. Using a
cushion to elevate the buttocks slightly higher than the crossed legs can
facilitate this posture, which is conducive to mental clarity.
- Abiding
in the Present: The goal of these techniques is to align the mind with
the immediate present moment. The 'I AM' is experienced when the mind is
not grasping at thoughts of the past or future, but is abiding fully in
the now. Any method that cuts off this grasping can reveal the underlying
presence.
- Eyes-Open
Practice: This presence can also be experienced outside of formal
meditation with eyes open. Simply look straight ahead into an open space
and relax the focus. An expansive view, such as an open field, is often
more conducive.
Audio-Entrainment and Brainwave Technology
A modern pedagogical approach involves using technology to induce a meditative state conducive to insight. Sim Pern Chong recommends technologies similar to Hemi-Sync, which use binaural beats.
- How
it Works: By feeding slightly different sound frequencies to each ear,
the brain generates a third 'difference-tone' that can entrain its
electrical activity into specific brainwave patterns (e.g., low-alpha or
theta).
- As you
listen, especially during periods of silence, gently turn your focus
inward. Ask the simple question, “who am I?” or "what is aware?"
Don't search for an answer in words or concepts. The answer is the
immediate, non-verbal knowing of awareness itself. Rest in that simple,
open feeling of Being.
- Neuro-physiological
Effects: Studies suggest this can lead to 'hemispheric
synchronization,' quieting the brain's Default Mode Network (DMN), which
is responsible for self-referential thought and the "me-story."
When this inner narrative subsides, the raw, wordless sense of 'I AM' can
become more apparent.
- A
Catalyst, Not a Guarantee: It is important to view this technology as
a powerful catalyst that can create a favorable physiological state for
awakening, but not a guarantee. Personal intention and practice remain
essential. Eckhart Tolle, for example, awakened spontaneously but later
partnered with the Monroe Institute to use Hemi-Sync as an aid for his
students.
Part 3: The Profound Insight into Anātman: From Non-Dual
Radiance to Selfless Radiance-As-Transience
The realization of "I AM" is a profound and stable
ground, but it is not the end of the Buddhist path. It can become a subtle
trap—a reified "True Self" or Universal Consciousness, a view Dōgen
directly refuted as the Senika heresy. The Buddhist insight into anātman
goes deeper. It involves turning the light of enquiry onto Awareness and
phenomena themselves, revealing them as empty of any permanent, independent, or
substantial self-nature. This progression from a substantialist to an
insubstantialist non-dual view is absolutely critical.
(A Pre-Anātman stage) Stage 3a: The Initial Non-Dual
Insight
This first non-dual breakthrough is pointed to by
"Class 2 Kōans" like Changsha's:
"Zen Master Changsha said to the assembly, 'The entire
ten-direction world is the eye of a monk... the entire ten-direction world is
one's own light.'"
This kōan directs the practitioner to the realization that
the entire world is a seamless, luminous display of Mind. It is the insight
that all appearances ARE the radiance of consciousness (心相一如). This is a profound experience
of non-duality. However, as John Tan clarifies, this initial insight is often
characterized by a "hyperreal" vividness. The world appears with a
magical, stark clarity, but it may not yet be seen as "unreal" or
empty. One can realize that "all is Mind's radiance" and still subtly
cling to "Mind" or "Radiance" as a real, underlying
substance—a substantialist view.
Stage 3b: The Anātman Insight - Realizing
Insubstantiality of Mind and Agentlessness
The full insight into anātman requires a further
step: penetrating the empty, selfless, and transient nature of Mind and the
agent, even if the emptiness of all phenomena has not yet been fully realized.
The Bahiya Sutta provides the ultimate instruction for this, and the two stanzas
of contemplation are a direct, practical application of its wisdom. A critical
warning is needed here. While this stage dismantles the illusion of an agent or
a substantial Mind, if the insight into emptiness is not extended to all
phenomena (the five aggregates), a subtle trap remains.
Without seeing the insubstantiality of forms, sounds, and
thoughts themselves, these phenomena can appear 'hyperreal'. The initial
emptying of self/Self does not necessarily lead to an illusion-like experience
of reality. It does, however, allow experience to become vivid, luminous,
direct, and non-dual. This first emptying may also lead a practitioner to
become attached to an 'objective' world or to perceive it as physical, before
the maturity of insight extends anātman into twofold emptiness (the emptiness
of both self and phenomena). Even though phenomena are no longer seen as
expressions of a substantial Mind (Mind is realised to be empty of an
inherently existing substance), they can still be perceived as having their own
inherent, momentary existence—as being truly arisen, real, or even physically
solid. This is a subtle clinging to the reality of dharmas, which is only fully
deconstructed as wisdom matures further (as discussed in Part 7).
Yin Ling on Mind and Meditation: The Practice of Satipatthana (The Foundation of Mindfulness)
Before we discuss contemplating the stanzas on Anatman (no-self) as a potent trigger for its realization, it is crucial to understand the correct approach. As John Tan has noted, intellectual analysis is not the path to this insight.
"It is of absolute importance to know that there is no way the stanzas can be correctly understood through inference, logical deduction, or induction. This isn't because the stanzas are mystical or transcendental, but simply because mental chatter is the wrong approach. The right technique is through Vipassana—a direct and attentive mode of bare observation that allows for seeing things as they are. It is worth noting that this mode of knowing becomes natural as non-dual insight matures; before that, it can require significant effort.” - https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2009/03/on-anatta-emptiness-and-spontaneous.html
This section, therefore, delves into the "how-to" of this direct practice. It explains the method of Satipatthana as the means to cultivate the direct Vipassanic mode of contemplation required to realize Anatman effectively, moving beyond mere intellectual consideration.
Yin Ling previously outlined this foundational practice as follows:
“The first step in meditation is to ascertain the knowing Mind. Without this, there can be no realization. All of your experiences—the bird, the sky, a physical touch, the taste of coffee—are Mind. Once this Mind is ascertained and strengthened, it will guide you away from the "self-view" and toward realization, preventing you from getting lost. The Satipatthana Sutta is a wonderful guide for reaching this insight. It instructs us to "feel the body in the body." When practicing, do not think; simply feel.
Feel the Body Directly: Truly feel the body from inside the body. Feel a sound from within the sound itself.
Extend to All Experiences: Extend this practice to all phenomena. Feel your feelings, thoughts, and the input from all six senses directly, as they are and from within themselves. It is as if you are placing your awareness into the center of a feeling and experiencing it from the inside.
The goal of the Buddha's mindfulness practice is to transform our mind by weakening the central energy of the self and helping us realize that awareness has always been infused in our senses, not separate from them.
With correct instruction and consistent practice (e.g., two hours a day), Satipatthana will lead you to the powerful realization of no-self. The mind's energy can transform rapidly, often within 8 to 12 months.
My own path went through Vipassana, which led to a non-dual state with a strong sense of knowingness, and finally to the realization of anatta (no-self).”
Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh explains a crucial point about this practice:
"After explaining the sixteen methods of conscious breathing, the Buddha speaks about the Four Establishments of Mindfulness and the Seven Factors of Awakening. Everything that exists can be placed into one of the Four Establishments of Mindfulness—the body, the feelings, the mind, and the objects of the mind. Another way of saying “objects of mind” is “all dharmas,” which means “everything that is.” Therefore, all of the Four Establishments of Mindfulness are objects of the mind. In this sutra, we practice full awareness of the Four Establishments through conscious breathing. For a full understanding of the Four Establishments of Mindfulness, read the Satipatthana Sutta.24
The phrases “observing the body in the body,” “observing the feelings in the feelings,” “observing the mind in the mind,” and “observing the objects of mind in the objects of mind,” appear in the third section of the sutra. The key to “observation meditation” is that the subject of observation and the object of observation not be regarded as separate. A scientist might try to separate herself from the object she is observing and measuring, but students of meditation have to remove the boundary between subject and object. When we observe something, we are that thing.
“Nonduality” is the key word. “Observing the body in the body” means that in the process of observing, you don’t stand outside your own body as if you were an independent observer, but you identify yourself one hundred percent with the object being observed. This is the only path that can lead to the penetration and direct experience of reality. In “observation meditation,” the body and mind are one entity, and the subject and object of meditation are one entity also. There is no sword of discrimination that slices reality into many parts. The meditator is a fully engaged participant, not a separate observer."
Thich Nhat Hanh, (2011-12-20T22:58:59). Awakening of the Heart. Parallax Press. Kindle Edition.
Expanded Practical Enquiry: A Unified Practice for Anātman
based on the Bahiya Sutta
- The
Synergy: The Bahiya Sutta's core instruction—"In the seeing, just
the seen"—encapsulates both stanzas.
- Stanza
1: There is thinking, no thinker
There is hearing, no hearer
There is seeing, no seer
- Stanza
2: In thinking, just thoughts
In hearing, just sounds
(Highly recommended reading: https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2009/03/on-anatta-emptiness-and-spontaneous.html)
As John Tan emphasized, these two aspects must be realized
together for it to be a genuine insight into Anātman.
- The
Practice:
- Begin
with a Single Perception: Settle your mind and focus on one
continuous sensory experience. For example, look at a cup on a table.
- Apply
the Bahiya Sutta's Instruction to Deconstruct the Experience:
- Strip
Away the Label: Look at the cup. The word "cup" is a
learned concept. Before that label, what is your direct, empirical
experience? It is a collection of colors, shapes, shadows, and
reflections. That is all. Return to this raw, pre-conceptual data.
- Contemplate
the First Stanza (Agentlessness): Now, bring in the first stanza:
"There is seeing, no seer." As you look at these colors and
shapes, search for the independent "seer" who is doing the
looking. Can you find it? You will only find the impersonal process of
seeing itself. There is no agent.
- Contemplate
the Second Stanza (Non-Dual Radiance): Now, bring in the second
stanza, framed by the Bahiya Sutta's radical directness: "In the
seeing, just the seen." The word "just" is the
key. It means there is nothing else there. The practice is to see
through the illusion that there are two separate parts to vision: 1) the
seer, and the act of seeing and 2) the object seen.
- Investigate
deeply: See that the “seeing” and "awareness" do not exist
as something inherent or with its own essence apart from the colors; the
knowing radiance IS the colors, the colors ARE the knowing radiance, and
that all phenomena are not inert objects but are the self-luminous,
self-knowing radiance of Mind itself. Likewise, the "seen"
(the raw colors and shapes) is not a separate object "out
there" being perceived by a "seeing" "in here."
The visual objects ARE the colors and shapes, and these colors
and shapes ARE the seeing. You never experience an "unseen
color"; they are one single, indivisible process. The entire visual
field is not an object to your mind; it IS the active,
knowing radiance of Mind itself.
Kyle Dixon writes: "For the Buddhas, the phenomenal
field does not show up as an external given, but as their very own display.
This essentially means that knowing and known are not different. The known is
the activity of knowing itself." Rongzom: "The buddhas and
bodhisattvas are the subject, and the unmistaken authentic reality is the
object. Thus, it is said in the sūtras that the subject and object are not
two." Kūkai: "Though mind and color are different, their essence is the
same. Color is mind; mind is color. They blend with one another without
obstruction. Therefore, the knower is the known, and the known is the knower.
The knower is reality, and reality is the knower."
- The
Liberating Insight of "Not Being 'With That'": The Bahiya
Sutta's instruction culminates in liberation: "Then, Bahiya, as
you are not thereby, you will not be therein. As you are not therein, it
will be clear to you that there is no here or there or in between. This,
just this, is the end of suffering." This points to the final
fruit of the Hinayana path, Arhatship. The crucial, irreversible step on
this path is the direct insight into anātman. When it is directly
realized that seer and seeing are not anything in and of themselves apart
from vision and colors, and the colors ARE the seeing, and that there is
no seer, the entire foundation for a self-view (sakkāya-diṭṭhi) collapses. This
direct seeing-through of the illusion of a self/Self marks the attainment
of Stream-entry (Sotāpanna: See articles Meaning of Stream-Entry and
Reddit post: [insight] [buddhism] A reconsideration of the meaning of
"Stream-Entry" considering the data points of both pragmatic
Dharma and traditional Buddhism), after which the final cessation of
suffering described by the Buddha is certain when the practice of sila,
samadhi, prajna is perfected and comes to complete fruition.
- The
Ultimate Collapse: It is crucial to realize in Anatman, "In
hearing, no hearer" (dismantling the illusion of an agent). But as
Thusness/John Tan pointed out, the final deconstruction goes even further
than merely “hearing without hearer”. "In hearing, only sound. No
hearing." Ultimately, even the verb "hearing" or
"seeing" is a subtle conceptual overlay. The final insight
collapses the entire structure. There is not even "seeing
happening." as "seeing" too is without any inherent
existence of its own. There is simply (self-seen/self-aware/self-knowing)
radiant color. There is simply sound. The raw phenomenal datum arises
agentlessly as the luminosity of Mind that is No-Mind.
- The
Realization of Anātman as Dharma Seal: When this practice
matures, the insights from the two stanzas merge. This is not the
achievement of some new, extraordinary peak state, but the direct
realization of the Pellucid No-Self, which is simply seeing in
accordance with the Dharma Seal—the way things have always already
been. This realization has two key facets:
- Agentless
Unfolding: Through contemplating "no seer," "no
hearer," you directly realize that experience unfolds without a
central coordinating agent or "doer." Actions happen, thoughts
think, and senses sense, but no one is authoring them. This is the
selfless nature of reality, always already so.
- Non-Dual
Radiance: Through contemplating "in seeing just the seen,"
"in hearing just the heard," you realize that there is no
"awareness", "seeing", or "hearing" apart
from the colors; the colors ARE the knowing radiance, and that all
phenomena are not inert objects but are the self-luminous, self-knowing
radiance of Mind itself. This is the non-dual nature of reality, always
already so.
- When
unified, this insight reveals reality as a seamless, agentless, and
dynamic process. It is a world of verbs, not nouns. There is
no "Seer" seeing a "scene," only seeing-happening,
which ultimately resolves into just scenery. Everything is at zero
distance, gaplessly intimate, self-seen and self-heard without duality, as
the radiant knowingness of Mind that is No-Mind. This insight is profound,
yet it is not the final attainment of ultimate Buddhahood but a crucial,
irreversible seeing of the true nature of things. An elaboration of how
life is experienced after the realization can be found in
https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2021/04/why-awakening-is-so-worth-it.html
- The
Nature of This Realization (Dōgen's View): This agentless, selfless
process is not a cold, mechanical, or dead unfolding. It is the very Buddha-Nature
itself in dynamic expression. This view is central to the Sōtō lineage to
which Ejō was the direct successor. As Dōgen, his master, taught:
Dōgen: "Therefore, the very impermanency of grass and
tree, thicket and forest is the Buddha nature... Supreme and complete
enlightenment, because it is impermanent, is the Buddha nature."
The "light" of the Kōmyōzō Zanmai is not
the light of a permanent, unchanging ground. It is the brilliant, radiant light
of moment-to-moment arising and ceasing. The final view is not a static abiding
in an unperturbed changeless Awareness; it is the dynamic, effortless, and
compassionate living as this transient, radiant reality.
“Buddha-nature
For Dōgen, buddha-nature or busshō (佛性) is all of reality, "all
things" (悉有).[41]
In the Shōbōgenzō, Dōgen writes that "whole-being is the
Buddha-nature" and that even inanimate objects (rocks, sand, water) are an
expression of Buddha-nature. He rejected any view that saw buddha-nature as a
permanent, substantial inner self or ground. Dōgen describes buddha-nature as
"vast emptiness", "the world of becoming" and writes that
"impermanence is in itself Buddha-nature".[42] According to Dōgen:
Therefore, the very impermanency of grass and tree, thicket
and forest is the Buddha nature. The very impermanency of men and things, body
and mind, is the Buddha nature. Nature and lands, mountains and rivers, are
impermanent because they are the Buddha nature. Supreme and complete
enlightenment, because it is impermanent, is the Buddha nature.[43]
Takashi James Kodera writes that the main source of Dōgen's
understanding of buddha-nature is a passage from the Nirvana sutra which was
widely understood as stating that all sentient beings possess
buddha-nature.[41] However, Dōgen interpreted the passage differently,
rendering it as follows: All are (一 切)
sentient beings, (衆生) all
things are (悉有) the
Buddha-nature (佛性); the
Tathagata (如来) abides
constantly (常住), is
non-existent (無) yet
existent (有), and is
change (變易).[41]
Kodera explains that "whereas in the conventional
reading the Buddha-nature is understood as a permanent essence inherent in all
sentient beings, Dōgen contends that all things are the Buddha-nature. In the
former reading, the Buddha-nature is a change less potential, but in the
latter, it is the eternally arising and perishing actuality of all things in
the world."[41] Thus for Dōgen buddha-nature includes everything, the
totality of "all things", including inanimate objects like grass,
trees and land (which are also "mind" for Dōgen).[41] -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dōgen#Buddha-nature “
Part 4: Shattering the Obstacles on the Path
With this three-phase model of realization in mind, Ejō’s
warnings about the pitfalls of practice become even clearer. They are precisely
the errors that prevent this progression.
- Seeking
an External Light: One of the most common pitfalls, which Ejō warns
against repeatedly, is to conceptualize "light" as a sensory
object or a phenomenon with specific characteristics. He states that this
luminosity "is not blue, yellow, red, white, or black." He then
describes how "foolish people," upon hearing the word
"light," immediately begin to search for something akin to
"the glow of a firefly, like lamplight, like the luminosity of the
sun, moon, gold, or jade." This act of objectifying the light is a
fundamental error. It keeps the practitioner trapped as a
"seeker" looking for a "sought" object, reinforcing
the very subject-object duality they are trying to transcend. By looking
for a radiance "out there" to be perceived, one misses the
crucial point: the true light is the formless, ever-present knower
itself. Therefore, seeing through this trap is the essential first step,
requiring one to abandon the search for any special appearance and instead
turn the faculty of awareness back upon itself to realize the "I
AM" presence directly.
- The
Trap of Stillness (The "State" vs. "Principle" Error):
Mistaking a quiet mental state for realization is a common pitfall. This
is often confusing a dull, non-conceptual state for the vibrant, clear
light of pristine awareness. The "I AM" is not a dull blankness;
it is bright, luminous knowingness and pure Presence.
- The
Reification of Consciousness: This is a subtle trap that inevitably
arises, beginning with the foundational "I AM" realization up to
the initial non-dual insight (pre-anatta, substantialist nondual phase of
realisation). The practitioner may feel they have found the "True
Mind" or Universal Consciousness and reify it into a new, subtle
identity. This is why the deeper anātman enquiry is necessary—to
deconstruct this final, subtle "Self," not the egoic self but
the Great Self with a capital ‘S’.
Part 5: The Flame Sermon - Reality as Non-Dual, Total
Radiance
The metaphor of the "great mass of fire" (大火聚, daikaju), which Ejō invokes,
is a powerful and direct pointer to the nature of non-dual radiance as
appearance.
- A
Total, Immersive Field: A great fire is an all-encompassing reality.
It is not an object that one can stand apart from and observe. To approach
it is to be enveloped by its heat and light. This illustrates that there
is no standpoint from which one can observe reality. The deeper truth of anātman
is that there is no "one" to be apart, nor an "it" to
be apart from.
- The
Radiance and Directness of Appearance: This provides the perfect
context for Yunmen's famous answer. When asked, "What is this
luminosity of yours?", he doesn't point to a mystical source or offer
a philosophical concept. He points directly at the "great mass of
fire" that is the raw, vivid, phenomenal world right in front of
everyone: "The monks' hall, the Buddha hall. The kitchen, the
storehouse, the temple gate." The kitchen is the fire. The
temple gate is the fire. The luminosity is not hidden behind
these appearances; the appearances themselves, in their direct and
undeniable presence, ARE the luminosity. The "great mass of
fire" is not a symbol for anything else; it is a direct pointer to
the totality and immediacy of the radiant phenomenal field itself. It is
the inescapable, all-encompassing Treasury of Light.
Part 6: The Life of Realization - "The Person of
Old"
The "person of old" (旧时人, kyūjinin) is the one who
lives from this integrated, anātman understanding. The distinction
between a substantial Mind and the world has vanished.
- Effortless
Functioning (无为,
wúwéi): This person is "like a great dead man" because the
separate, striving ego-agent is dead. Yet they are fully alive and
responsive. Their actions are not decided upon; they flow spontaneously
from the totality of the situation. This is the effortless action that
arises when there is no "one" standing apart to calculate or
contrive.
- The
World as Selfless, Radiant Process: For this person, the world is no
longer an external object being perceived by an internal subject. The
colors on the mountains, the changing of seasons, the feeling of the
breath—all are direct, immediate, and selfless expressions of the one,
dynamic, radiant reality. There is no longer a "me" seeing a
"flower." There is only the sentient, selfless verb of
flowering-seeing.
Part 7: The Path After Anātman - Practice-Enlightenment
and the Two Wings
The profound insight into anātman is not a final
endpoint, but a crucial gateway. It marks the end of the seeker and the
path of deliberate "how-to" practice in one sense, but it is the
beginning of a different, deeper mode of practice in another. It is a grave
error to conclude that because there is no-self, there is nothing to do. The
correct understanding is the opposite: because there is no fixed self,
there is only the ongoing flow of ignorance and afflicted activities that need
to be addressed. The insight into anātman becomes the very motivation
for continued, correctly-oriented practice.
Practice-Enlightenment (修証一如, shushō-ittō): This is
where Dōgen's core teaching becomes the living reality of the practitioner. The
insight into anātman reveals that there was never a separation between
practice and enlightenment to begin with. Practice is not a means to an end (a
future enlightenment). Rather, every moment of rightly-oriented practice, such
as shikantaza (just sitting), IS the direct expression and
actualization of awakening and Buddha-nature. This is what Dōgen's teacher
Rujing meant by "dropping off body and mind"—it is not a goal to be
achieved, but the very act of zazen itself, free from the coverings of desire
and delusion. (As per Wikipedia): To study the Buddha Way is to study the self.
To study the self is to forget the self. To forget the self is to be actualized
by myriad things. When actualized by myriad things, your body and mind as well
as the bodies and minds of others drop away. No trace of enlightenment remains,
and this no-trace continues endlessly.
The Two Wings of Wisdom (Prajñā) and Compassion (Karuṇā): The post-anātman
path is often described as the cultivation of the two wings of a bird, which
must be in balance for flight.
- The
Maturation of Wisdom: The focus of practice after the initial anātman
insight shifts from acquiring a realization to the natural
functioning and maturation of wisdom (prajñā). This is not a passive
process but an ongoing, dynamic authentication of the truth in every
moment. This maturation involves deepening the understanding of twofold
emptiness—the emptiness of both person (pudgala-nairātmya) and all
phenomena (dharma-nairātmya). This can be understood through the
complementary dimensions of "-a" and "+a" emptiness.
Also see https://atr-passerby.com/ and https://www.awakeningtoreality.com/2023/08/compilation-of-post-anatta-advise.html for pointers to trigger such insights experientially.
1. -a: The Deconstructive Insight into the Emptiness of
Phenomena
This is the direct seeing into the insubstantial and
illusory nature of all reality. It is the profound wisdom that deconstructs the
nature of whatever dependently originates. This "Freedom from
Elaborations" (niṣprapañca) is achieved by seeing that whatever
dependently originates has such a nature: a lack of self-nature (svabhāva);
a non-arisen nature (anutpāda); an illusoriness (māyā); and
freedom from the eight conceptual extremes (Arising/Ceasing,
Permanent/Annihilation, Coming/Going, One/Many). When it is directly seen that
all phenomena are empty in this profound way, the mind's tendency to
proliferate conceptual fabrications (prapañca) collapses. Buddhahood
does not block conceptuality; as Ācārya Malcolm Smith notes, Dzogchen root
texts state that a Buddha still employs conceptual designations yet never
mistakes them for intrinsically or independently existent things. This accords
with Nāgārjuna’s famous verse (MMK 24.18) that ‘whatever is dependently arisen
is emptiness—that, being a dependent designation, is itself the Middle Way.’
Contemporary teacher John Tan echoes the same point in his commentaries,
emphasising that conceptuality continues to function but are recognised as
dependent designations and non-arisen (empty and free from extremes). Contemporary
Zen masters I’ve met have reiterated similar points.
Ejō illustrates this "-a" insight perfectly by
drawing on Mahayana sutras, pointing to the empty, signless, and illusory
nature of all things:
"Secret Master, all dharmas are signless, meaning they
are of the characteristic of empty space... the Mahāyāna practitioner gives
rise to the mind of the unconditioned vehicle; dharmas are without self-nature.
Why is that? Just as those practitioners of old, observing the skandhas and
ālaya[-vijñāna], knew their self-nature to be like an illusion, a mirage, a
reflection, a spinning wheel of fire, a gandharva's city."
2. +a: The Functional Insight of Dependent Arising in
Action
While the "-a" insight deconstructs reality to
reveal its empty nature, the "+a" insight sees how that very
emptiness functions as the living, expressive, and radiant unfolding of the
world. This is "Total Exertion": the realization that in each
moment, the entire web of interdependent existence is fully present and
exerting itself as that single appearance.
Critically, as John Tan and the provided texts caution, this
must not be mistaken for the reification of a "Whole" as a
substantial entity. The very paradigm of 'parts and wholes' is a conceptual
trap that total exertion transcends. It does not mean a part (a flower) is
contained within a larger, static Whole. Rather, the flower is the
entire web of interdependent conditions functionally expressing itself in that
moment. There is no 'Whole' as a noun or truly existing entity; there is only
the selfless, dynamic functioning of the all, without any underlying substance
or container.
Dōgen's passage from the Genjōkōan masterfully
illustrates this "+a" functional insight. He begins by using the boat
analogy to explain the mistaken perception of a fixed self, then expands it to
show how the empty rower, boat, and world function as one undivided activity of
total exertion:
"If one riding in a boat watches the coast, one
mistakenly perceives the coast as moving. If one watches the boat [in relation
to the surface of the water], then one notices that the boat is moving.
Similarly, when we perceive the body and mind in a confused way and grasp all
things with a discriminating mind, we mistakenly think that the self-nature of
the mind is permanent. When we intimately practice and return right here, it is
clear that all things have no [fixed] self.
Life is just like riding in a boat. You raise the sails and
you row with the oar. Although you row, the boat gives you a ride and without
the boat no one could ride. But you ride in the boat and your riding makes the
boat what it is.
Investigate a moment such as this. At just such a moment,
there is nothing but the world of the boat. The sky, the water, and the shore
all are the boat's moment, which is not the same as a moment that is not the
boat's. When you ride in a boat, your body and mind and the environs together
are the undivided activity of the boat. The entire earth and the entire sky are
the undivided activity of the boat."
Synthesizing Wisdom: Seeing the Dream-Like Nature of
Vivid Reality
The ultimate maturation of wisdom involves holding these two
insights—the empty, illusory nature of things (-a) and their vivid,
functional appearance (+a)—as an inseparable unity. This is precisely
what Dōgen pointed to when describing the dream-like relativity of all things.
In his Mountains and Waters Sutra, he illustrates that there is no
absolute, independently existing reality:
Dōgen: "Not all beings see mountains and waters in the
same way... Hungry ghosts see water as raging fire... Dragons and fish see
water as a palace... Human beings see water as water... There is no original
water."
There is no objectively "real" water, only the
contextual, dependently arisen experience of "water-seeing." This
vivid yet empty presence is like a dream. As Dōgen further clarifies, this
dream is not a dull or sleepy state: “The entire world, crystal-clear
everywhere, is a dream; and a dream is all grasses [things] clear and bright...
Never mistake this, however, for a dreamy state.”
As John Tan clarifies, the maturation of wisdom requires
integrating these two intertwined insights:
"Tasting the 'realness' of what appears and what
appears is nothing real are two different insights... It is not only
realizing mere appearances are just one's radiance clarity but that
empty clarity is like a rainbow. Beautiful and clearly appears, but nothing
'there' at all. These two aspects are very important: 1. Very 'vivid',
pellucid, and 2. Nothing real. Tasting either one will not trigger the 'aha'
realization."
This entire process of maturation corresponds to the
Mahayana path of purifying the "obstruction of knowledge" (jñeya-āvaraṇa). Ejō concludes this
point by warning that mistaking any view for a final reality is a trap:
“Clearly know that within the Treasury of Luminosity of the unconditioned
vehicle, there is no self-nature and no views. Self and views are different
names for demonic apparitions.”
John Tan wrote over a decade ago,
”Hi David, I see that you are expressing what I called the +A and –A of emptying.
(+A)
When you cook, there is no self that cooks, only the activity of cooking. The
hands moves, the utensils act, the water boils, the potatoes peels… here there
is no room for simplicity or complications, the “kitchen” went beyond it’s own
imputation and dissolved into the activity of cooking and the universe is fully
engaged in this cooking.
(-A)
30 years of practice and 23 years of kitchen life is like a passing thought.
How heavy is this thought?
The whereabouts of this thought?
Taste the nature of this thought.
It never truly arises.”
- The
Arising of Great Compassion: This deepening of wisdom is what gives
rise to true, great compassion (mahākaruṇā). As Rujing clarified to Dōgen, the
zazen of a Buddha is different from that of an arhat because it is
grounded in great compassion and the vow to save all beings. This
compassion is not a moralistic choice or a sentimental feeling, but the
spontaneous, unobstructed, and natural expression of wisdom in action.
When the boundary between self and other is truly seen as illusory, the well-being
of another is no longer separate from one's own. This active compassion is
the antidote to the pitfall of a dry, sterile "emptiness
sickness," allowing one to live out the implications of
non-separation in the world.
This continued path is the inseparable union of these two
wings, a dynamic unfolding where practice becomes the effortless expression of
enlightenment itself.
Conclusion: The Living Light of Practice-Enlightenment
Koun Ejō's Kōmyōzō Zanmai provides more than a map to
a destination; it charts the entire territory of liberation. The path guides
the practitioner through a profound sequence of deconstruction: from
discovering the foundational ground of Presence, to seeing the world as Mind's radiant
display, and finally, to the crucial insight into anātman which
dissolves even that ground into a selfless, agentless, and radiantly
impermanent process.
Yet, as Ejō and his master Dōgen make clear, this ultimate
insight is not a sterile endpoint but a vital gateway. It is the end of the
seeker, but the true beginning of practice-enlightenment (shushō-ittō), where
every action becomes the living expression of awakening. The "Treasury of
Light" is fully realized not in a static abiding, but in the dynamic
flight of the two wings of wisdom and compassion. Wisdom matures to see the
dream-like emptiness within the vivid, pellucid display of reality, while great
compassion arises as the spontaneous, functional expression of non-separation.
Thus, the light is not merely realized; it is lived. To engage with this text
is to be invited not just to find the light, but to become its ceaseless,
compassionate, and wise unfolding in the world.